１ 港台編輯和工會自由度十足，竟然可以在新處長上任首日施如此聲勢的下馬威：舉牌示威要求新處長下台。強勢至此，還懼怕沒有自由？！
２ 工會舉出「不做官媒」示威牌真的何其荒謬，港台就是政府內一部門，是百分百官媒，如果不想做官媒者，應自行辭職，而不是一面享受公務員身份待遇，另一方面又要不受政府管理。
３ 工會主席說「憤怒」，莫明其妙！她的理由是處長不能由政務官出任，因港台要「監察」政府，而政務官卻要「執行」政府政策。主席此話全屬歪理：Ａ.是誰決定港台必須要與政府對著幹？ Ｂ.作為政府其中一個部門，為何就不容許政務官做主管？ Ｃ.為何港台作為一個政府部門可以不執行政府決策？ Ｄ.如此容易便「憤怒」，如此情緒化，公眾如何信任港台這類編輯可以客觀中立？
４ 何謂編輯自主？編輯自主如何界定？任何新聞機構都有主管，包括美國媒體也一樣。媒體從來都不是真空的，必然有其大方向，媒體老闆與總編，是同道才可合而共事，不配合管理層方針的編輯會被開除。編輯自主在現實世界裡是有限制的，不存在無邊際的自主權。有見過美國之音製作嘲諷美國政府的節目嗎？現在港台工會要求的實際上不是編務自主，而是奪權，硬要一個政府部門行政上脫離政府，把權力交由部門內的仍享受公務員福利的個別人士永遠把持。
５ 「編輯自主」不可能無限量上綱上線。有「編輯自主」，不等於現有節目主持人或監製便是太上老君或天皇，誰也動他不得。目前上演的這場黑地氈迎新主管的戲碼，是人家仍未正式工作，港台這群示威記者及編輯，在「預估」及疑似將受到監督的情況下，立即為政府（新主管）安插罪名，圖先發制人，惡人先告狀。港台的節目方針由誰決定，是節目主持說了算，政府就不能管嗎？這些節目主持又向誰問責？港台是他們的金飯碗嗎？打著編輯自主之名，享受不受任何監管的終身職位，天下間竟有此極端的特權階級！絶對權力只會引來絕對腐化，港台工會要求絕對的特權，誰將能保證他們不會有利益輸送，公器私用或以權謀私？重複，天下間沒有一個新聞媒體是由員工百分百自決而不受監督的。
６ 去年頒佈的港台約章，其中有編輯自主一項，但沒有港台必須監察政府之說。作為政府媒體，港台的責任是正確宣傳和介紹政府政策，為何港台必須要與政府站在對立面呢？這是誰定的？政黨人士公開與工會站在同一陣線抗議新處長上任，那港台工會的獨立性又何在？！港台工會與政黨的關係有沒有徹底向社會公開交代？作為應堅守中立的公務員和新聞工作者，如何解釋其與某些特定的政黨關係密切？又如何讓人相信今天的港台不是某些政治黨派的喉舌？
７ 港台是屬於政府的，也是屬於全港市民的，不能只屬於「現職」其中的某些職員。港台節目製作要向政府以至全港市民負責任，而不應只扮演反政府的角色。實事求是，社會上存在不同政見，由全體納稅人供養的港台，為何僅代表個別黨派的意識型態？已經高度政治化的港台應該立即受到整頓，全面去政治化，返回真正中立持平的軌道上。
5 comments:
THE UNION CHAIRWOMAN SHOULD BE SACKED
IMMEDIATELY. WHO IS THE BOSS ? the hong kong government is the boss. THE NEW DIRECTOR SHOULD DO SOMETHING TO SACK THOSE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT. THERE IS LIMIT IN FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY. THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT WHO PAYS THEIR SALARY. IF THEY ARE NOT HAPPY WHY NOT RESIGN AND LEAVE THE SERVICE. THEY ARE TOO FREE ALREADY
DON'T LET THEM MAKING USE BY THE TROUBLE COUNCILORS.
THE STAFF OF RADIO HONG KONG DID NOT GIVE FACE TO THE NEW DIRECTOR ON THE FIRST DAY. THEY WANT HIM TO STEP DOWN. DO THEY THINK THEY ARE THE BOSS OF RADIO HONG KONG. WHO PAYS THE SALARIES TO THEM? DO THEY THINK HONG KONG GOVERNMENT IS PAYING THEM SALARIES TO AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND THE APPOINTED DIRECTOR ? IT IS DISGUSTING TO SEE THE COUNCILORS are supporting the STAFF INVOLVED. AS THEY KNOW THEY ARE FREE TO LEAVE THE SERVICE IF THEY ARE NOT HAPPY.
THIS IS REAL FREEDOM ! why not the new director tells them to resign if they don't feel happy with the government and his appointment to be the new director ? Tell them they are free to go. I BELIEVE IF MY SUGGESTION IS ACCEPTED THERE WILL BE NO MORE RALLY AGAINST HIM.
i AGREED WITH Mr Leung and Mr Lo 's comments. I hope alot of Hong Kong people see these comments. In addition, i want to comment that some Hong Kong people nowadays are abusive with the meaning of democracy. They always use this to take advantage for their own benefits.
大家應該把梁總這篇文傳開去，讓更多人讀到。
香港某程度上已成為淪陷區－－被某些傳媒、港大別有用心的民調（不斷為官員所謂打分），以及民主霸權治港。
在記協、《明報》（尤其在李成康事件上）等公信力大失的當前情況下，今天港大民意調查鍾庭耀又發表已完全不可信的所謂調查結果－－說：香港言論自由在下降；以及公眾對傳媒信任度上升。－－真的笑死。 香港的情況，就由一些人任意塑造（以問卷為例，加些引導，限定選擇，就會得出他想要的效果）。
If you don't like it, there is always a place for you. However, there will always be hungry workers to fill your position.
If you think Hong Kong Radio is a
commercial private enterprise, then you are so wrong.
Before the 1997 turnover to Mainland China, Hong Kong Radio had always been a government entity, just like BBC, VOA. It is a governmental agency. Every country has one.
If you think the major mainstream TV networks are indedpent in this country, then you are also wrong. THey side the policies and interests under the flag. It is supposed to be that way.
Post a Comment